Still, that attribution has been cited alongside broader legal arguments by lawyers representing families holding roughly $877 million in unpaid U.S. terrorism judgments against North Korea, who argue that if the assets are ultimately deemed linked to North Korea for enforcement purposes, they could potentially be used to satisfy those longstanding court awards.

Aave disputes that premise, arguing that the ether belongs to users harmed in the exploit, not to the attackers who briefly controlled it, turning the case into a fight over whether the funds should go to DeFi victims or to terrorism creditors.

In a separate lawsuit, many of the same terrorism judgment creditors sued privacy protocol Railgun DAO, alleging it allowed North Korean-linked funds to move through its infrastructure rather than freezing them, as part of a broader strategy to pursue allegedly Pyongyang-linked crypto across decentralized finance.

Voting on the AIP is scheduled to begin May 15.

More For You

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater. (CoinDesk archives)

Ray Dalio joins the privacy debate, saying Bitcoin’s full transparency makes it less likely to be adopted by central banks.

What to know:

  • Ray Dalio joins the privacy debate, saying Bitcoin’s full transparency makes it less likely to be adopted by central banks.
  • He added that bitcoin’s correlation with tech stocks and relatively small market size put it at a disadvantage compared with gold as a reserve hedge.

About the Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories