Here are some highlights, according to a list of the proposals circulated ahead of the hearing:

Thursday’s session to consider advancing the Clarity Act is likely already well planned for what the Republican majority will allow into the legislation. The last time the Clarity Act was on final approach to a markup in this same committee, it made it to this stage in which some 75 amendments were offered, though that hearing was postponed shortly after.

Previous wrinkles in the negotiation have since been ironed out over four months of talks, clearing a path for committee approval this week. Once that happens, this bill can be merged with the parallel effort that already cleared the Senate Agriculture Committee.

However, some significant changes are still expected after this week, including the effort to resolve the Democrats’ demand for a conflict-of-interest provision on cutting ties between government officials and the crypto sector, most notably seen with the president and his family. A meeting earlier this week on that ethics provision reportedly remained contentious, and Democrats including Senator Kirsten Gillibrand have said the Clarity Act will not get approved in the Senate without it.

Clarity’s advocates need to secure a number of Democratic supporters for the bill if it’s going to clear the 60-vote hurdle that’s standard in the Senate. Then the bill needs to get another approval from the U.S. House, which had already passed a similar bill last year.

In a Wednesday posting on social media site X, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong called the bill “strong” and said it “will benefit the American people by making the US financial system faster, cheaper and more accessible.”

“Mark it up,” he said.

Read More: Clarity Act, in the flesh, unveiled by U.S. Senate Banking Committee before hearing

More For You

(Grant Cai/Unsplash)

Spokesperson for regulator denies that it put pressure on ARIA Resort & Casino for hosting Predict 2026

What to know:

  • Predict 2026 has said it moved its conference from Las Vegas to New York because of regulatory pressure from the Nevada Gaming Control Board, a claim the regulator disputes.
  • A spokesperson for the Nevada Gaming Control Board said it did not pressure any licensee or venue to cancel or decline…

About the Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories