This would include an advisory that notes “payroll tax evasion,” shell companies and “the strategic use of unregistered money services businesses, third-party payment processors, or peer-to-peer platforms to facilitate ‘off-the-books’ wage payments intended to bypass Bank Secrecy Act reporting thresholds or tax obligations,” among other types of entities.

While the order did not explicitly mention cryptocurrency or decentralized finance trading platforms, they could get caught up in any ultimate guidance, said Nicholas Anthony, a research fellow at the Cato Institute.

The next question is what might be in the guidance and advisory.

“Right now it’s in the hands of the Treasury, and the Treasury is able to apply it not only however it sees fit, but also to whoever it sees fit, because of the broader power that the Treasury has under the Bank Secrecy Act,” he said.

Senate shenanigans

The Senate Banking Committee voted to advance the Clarity Act just over a week ago.

The expectation was the overall Senate might get to this sometime in the next month, to sort out ethics and other outstanding issues and then vote on whether to send the bill to the House of Representatives. That timeline took a bit of a hit Thursday, when the Senate left town for the Memorial Day recess without voting on a reconciliation bill to fund the Department of Homeland Security, among other things.

The issue is this: There’s really only so much time to get stuff done on the Senate floor. There are 19 working days in June and 15 in July. There’s another five in August and then everyone’s gone for the rest of the summer.

In that time, the Senate has to sort through reconciliation, a renewal of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (which will expire in mid-June) and possibly a housing bill.

Adding to the tension is the reason why the Senate left town. President Donald Trump’s administration wanted $1 billion for his planned East Wing ballroom and more recently another $1.8 billion for a weaponization fund, which members of both parties have referred to as a “slush fund.” The Senate had already dropped the ballroom funding from the bill, but the other $1.8 billion appeared to be too much to negotiate this week.

Negotiations over these issues — if there isn’t any backroom dealing through the recess — can draw out the negotiation process, further limiting floor time for Clarity. And of course, there’s still the ethics provision itself in the market structure bill. The White House hasn’t yet indicated what exactly it might accept, so that’s another negotiation to watch out for.

This week

This week

If you’ve got thoughts or questions on what I should discuss next week or any other feedback you’d like to share, feel free to email me at nik@coindesk.com or find me on Bluesky @nikhileshde.bsky.social.

You can also join the group conversation on Telegram.

See ya’ll next week!

More For You

Capitol in Washington, D.C. (Harold Mendoza/Unsplash)

The bill’s restrictions on yield-bearing crypto products may push the industry away from passive “hold-to-earn” models and toward AI-driven, compliant yield infrastructure, according to STBL Chief Commercial Officer Joe Vollono.

What to know:

  • Proposed rules could force crypto firms to shift from passive yield to active, compliant capital strategies.
  • STBL’s Chief Commercial Officer Joe Vollono said AI-driven treasury, lending and collateral tools could become crypto’s next major infrastructure layer.
  • Banks worried about deposit flight may ultimately become participants in the stablecoin economy rather…

About the Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories