Victims of a Chinese investment fraud scheme are challenging the United Kingdom’s proposal to compensate them through a Chinese redress scheme, arguing that the plan could leave British authorities holding the majority of the upside from the seized 61,000 Bitcoin, now worth approximately £3.2 billion ($4.3 billion).
The Legal Battle in the UK High Court
According to court documents cited by the Financial Times, the dispute has escalated to the UK High Court, where groups representing victims are seeking to recover funds linked to the cryptocurrency seized by London police. The law firm Candey, representing about 5,700 victims, argues that the proposed compensation arrangement may not guarantee fair restitution.
The fraud scheme, which ran from 2014 to 2017, affected more than 128,000 investors in China. The scheme defrauded investors, converting the proceeds into Bitcoin and moving the assets abroad. British authorities seized the Bitcoin in 2018 during a raid on a London property linked to Jian Wen, who was later convicted of money laundering, and Zhimin Qian, the mastermind of the scheme, who was sentenced to over 11 years in prison in November 2025.
Compensation Claims and Legal Arguments
Martin Evans KC, representing the Director of Public Prosecutions, argued in court submissions that some legal claims could allow a subset of victims and litigation funders to recover sums exceeding their actual losses. This, he contends, could benefit a small subset of victims and their funders while excluding other victims and the Crown.
Candey defended the legal action, stating that court proceedings provide the best chance for victims to secure proper compensation. The firm also noted that its legal fees are capped at 18% of any recovered funds.
The Role of Bitcoin’s Value Fluctuations
The case highlights the complex legal questions surrounding crypto seizures, particularly when digital assets can appreciate significantly between confiscation and restitution. The Bitcoin seized in 2018 has more than quadrupled in value, complicating the issue of fair compensation.
The preliminary hearing, scheduled for July, will determine whether English or Chinese law should govern the claims to the seized Bitcoin. The High Court has also set a May 22 deadline for claimants seeking recovery under Section 281.
Policy and Regulatory Implications
The seized Bitcoin has drawn significant policy attention in Britain, with reports in 2025 indicating that officials were exploring how and when such holdings could be sold. The case also underscores the global nature of cryptocurrency fraud and the challenges of international legal cooperation in recovering assets.
As the legal battle continues, the outcome will set a precedent for future cases involving crypto seizures and the restitution of digital assets. The resolution of this dispute will be closely watched by legal experts, policymakers, and the broader crypto community.
About the Author
