In a bold move to assert federal authority, Michael Selig, the chairman of the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), has announced the agency’s intention to defend its jurisdiction over prediction markets against a growing tide of state-led litigation. In a video posted to X on Tuesday, Selig emphasized the CFTC’s longstanding role in regulating these markets, which he described as essential tools for risk management and information verification.
A Stance Against State Encroachment
Selig’s remarks come as several state-level regulators and authorities have filed legal challenges against platforms offering event contracts, including Coinbase, Crypto.com, Kalshi, and Polymarket. These platforms have been accused of operating in a regulatory gray area, with states arguing that they should have a say in how these markets are governed.
“Prediction markets aren’t new — the CFTC has regulated these markets for over two decades,” Selig stated. “They provide useful functions for society by allowing everyday Americans to hedge commercial risks and serve as an important check on our news media and information streams.”
Federal vs. State: The Legal Battle Intensifies
The CFTC’s stance has put it at odds with state regulators, who argue that the federal agency is overstepping its bounds. Last week, Polymarket filed a lawsuit against the state of Massachusetts, claiming that only the CFTC, as a federal regulator, has the authority to police such markets. This legal maneuver is seen as a test case that could set a precedent for how prediction markets are regulated across the country.
Selig has been doubling down on his public statements supporting prediction markets, even as state-led enforcement actions continue. On Monday, the Wall Street Journal published an op-ed by Selig, reiterating his position that states are “encroaching” on the CFTC’s authority. However, the issue has not gone unnoticed by federal lawmakers. On Friday, a group of 23 US senators sent a letter to Selig, urging him to “abstain from intervening in pending litigation” and to “realign the Commission’s actions with the statute and with the testimony” he provided to Congress during his confirmation hearing.
Legislative Uncertainty Looms
The senators’ letter criticizes Selig’s approach, suggesting that it “converts a statutory prohibition into case-by-case policy judgments” and places the CFTC in direct conflict with state and tribal governments. The letter further notes that Congress did not preempt state and tribal gambling laws when it established the CFTC’s jurisdiction over derivatives and prediction markets.
Meanwhile, federal regulators await the passage of a digital asset market structure bill, which has been under consideration by the US Senate for months. The bill, passed by the House of Representatives in July under the CLARITY Act, aims to provide clearer guidelines for the regulation of digital assets. Although the Senate Agriculture Committee voted to advance the bill in January, its fate remains uncertain, with no clear indication of whether it will gain enough support to pass a vote in the full chamber.
Future Implications and Expert Insights
Selig is scheduled to speak on the progress of the bill at an event organized by the Trump family-backed crypto platform World Liberty Financial at the president’s Mar-a-Lago club in Florida on Tuesday. The event is expected to draw attention from both supporters and critics of the CFTC’s stance on prediction markets.
Experts in the field suggest that the outcome of these legal battles and legislative efforts will have far-reaching implications for the future of prediction markets. If the CFTC succeeds in establishing its exclusive jurisdiction, it could lead to a more stable and predictable regulatory environment for these platforms. Conversely, if state regulators prevail, it could create a patchwork of laws that complicates the operation of prediction markets across different states.
In the meantime, the ongoing debate highlights the tension between federal and state regulatory powers, a tension that is likely to persist as the digital asset landscape continues to evolve. The coming months will be crucial in determining the future of prediction markets and the broader crypto ecosystem.
About the Author
