The state of Nevada has taken a decisive step against Kalshi, a prediction market platform, by filing a civil enforcement action in state court. This move follows the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s denial of Kalshi’s request to block the Nevada Gaming Control Board (NGCB) from taking action over the company’s sports prediction markets.
The NGCB’s lawsuit alleges that Kalshi is operating unlicensed wagering activities in violation of Nevada law. According to the regulator, Kalshi’s sports event contracts allow users to wager on the outcomes of sporting events, which requires a gaming license under state law. Kalshi, however, argues that it operates under the jurisdiction of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and is therefore subject to federal, not state, regulation.
The Legal Battle Intensifies
Kalshi’s struggle with Nevada began in March of last year when it received a cease-and-desist order from the NGCB. The company promptly filed a lawsuit to challenge the order, and in April, a federal court granted a temporary injunction to halt state action. However, the recent appellate court decision has removed this barrier, allowing Nevada to proceed with its enforcement action.
Kalshi has since moved to have the case heard in federal court, reiterating its position that it is regulated by the CFTC. The company’s motion argues that the state’s claim would require a narrow interpretation of federal commodity exchange laws, which Kalshi believes should be under the exclusive purview of the CFTC.
CFTC Weighs In
The CFTC has also entered the fray, with Chair Mike Selig filing an amicus brief in support of Crypto.com, another company facing a similar lawsuit from Nevada. The CFTC argues that states cannot interfere with its jurisdiction over designated contract markets (DCMs) by recharacterizing swaps trading on these platforms as illegal gambling.
“Event contracts are commodity derivatives and squarely within the CFTC’s regulatory remit,” Selig stated. “We will defend our exclusive jurisdiction over commodity derivatives.”
This stance from the CFTC adds a layer of complexity to the legal battle, as it pits federal regulatory authority against state gaming laws. The outcome of these cases could have significant implications for the future of prediction markets and how they are regulated across the United States.
Broader Implications for the Industry
The legal challenges faced by Kalshi and Crypto.com are not isolated incidents. Multiple states are taking action against prediction markets, which they view as unregulated gambling. This trend highlights the ongoing tension between emerging financial technologies and traditional regulatory frameworks.
Kalshi’s advisory board includes high-profile figures such as Donald Trump Jr., who has also served as an advisor to rival platform Polymarket. The involvement of such prominent individuals underscores the growing interest in prediction markets and their potential to disrupt traditional betting and financial sectors.
Looking Forward
The resolution of these legal battles will be crucial in shaping the regulatory landscape for prediction markets. If Kalshi and Crypto.com are successful in their arguments, it could pave the way for broader acceptance and integration of these platforms into the financial ecosystem. Conversely, a victory for the states could lead to stricter regulations and a more challenging environment for prediction market operators.
As the legal proceedings unfold, the industry and regulators will be closely watching to see how the balance of power shifts between federal and state authorities. The outcome will likely set a precedent that could influence the future of prediction markets and their role in the broader financial landscape.
About the Author
