As the specter of quantum computing looms larger on the horizon, Bitcoin’s status as a digital store of value is facing a new and formidable challenge. Onchain analyst and early Bitcoin adopter Willy Woo recently cautioned in an X post that the market is beginning to factor in the risk of a future ‘Q-Day’—a term used to describe the moment a powerful quantum computer could break today’s public key cryptography, fundamentally altering Bitcoin’s value proposition.
Woo’s warning underscores a critical juncture for Bitcoin, particularly in its competition with gold. The risk of a quantum breakthrough could potentially bring back into circulation around 4 million ‘lost’ Bitcoin, which are currently presumed to be irretrievably lost due to lost private keys. This could represent a significant portion of the total Bitcoin supply, currently estimated at 25% to 30%, and held in addresses with visible public keys.
The Quantum Threat and Lost Coins
The potential recirculation of these lost coins poses a significant threat to Bitcoin’s core narrative of scarcity. According to blockchain researchers, these 4 million coins could be among the first to be compromised in a quantum attack. This scenario could undermine the scarcity that has long been a cornerstone of Bitcoin’s appeal, especially in comparison to traditional assets like gold.
Woo estimates that there is about a 25% chance that the Bitcoin network will agree to freeze these coins through a hard fork, a highly contentious issue in the Bitcoin community. A hard fork would require a significant consensus among network participants and could lead to deep divisions within the community. The debate would center around the principles of fungibility, immutability, and property rights—values that are deeply ingrained in the Bitcoin ethos.
Market Reactions and Institutional Concerns
The market is already taking note of the quantum threat. Investors are beginning to price in the risk, leading to a structural discount on Bitcoin’s valuation relative to gold over the next five to 15 years. This shift is particularly significant as it suggests that Bitcoin’s long-term tendency to gain purchasing power when measured against gold may no longer hold.
Institutional investors are also becoming increasingly wary. Christopher Wood, a longtime strategist at Jefferies, recently removed Bitcoin from his flagship model portfolio and replaced it with gold, citing the potential impact of quantum computing. This move reflects a broader trend among institutional investors who are reevaluating their exposure to Bitcoin in light of the quantum threat.
Preparation and Mitigation
Despite the looming threat, many Bitcoin developers and cryptographers argue that the network has time to adapt. The post-quantum migration path is not a single, emergency hard fork but a phased process that will gradually steer the network toward new address formats and key management practices. This multi-year transition aims to ensure the network’s resilience against quantum attacks while minimizing disruption.
Some experts, like Alex Gladstein, chief strategy officer at the Human Rights Foundation, believe that even if a quantum breakthrough occurs and the lost coins are recovered, it is unlikely that they would flood the market. Instead, Gladstein suggests that a nation-state or a large institution might accumulate these coins, rather than dumping them, which could mitigate the immediate impact on the market.
Conclusion: A New Era for Bitcoin
As the quantum threat becomes more mainstream, Bitcoin must navigate a complex landscape of technological, economic, and social challenges. While the risk of a quantum breakthrough is real, the Bitcoin community’s ability to adapt and innovate remains a critical factor in its long-term survival. The coming years will test the resilience and ingenuity of the Bitcoin ecosystem, as it seeks to maintain its position as a leading digital asset in a rapidly evolving technological landscape.
About the Author
