The core team brought the network back up around 1:30 p.m. PT with what it called an “interim fix” that addressed the most common version of the bug but carried “a known issue with a low probability of causing a halt.” The team accepted that risk to restore the mainnet quickly while a more robust fix was developed.

The known risk materialized the next morning. A second outage began around 5 a.m. PT on Friday, when a transaction triggered a masked variant of the same bug, in which the insufficient-funds error was overridden by another cancellation reason, bypassing the interim patch. The core team finished a more robust fix, and validators adopted it by about 9:40 a.m. PT.

The third halt was a knock-on from the second. When validators restarted to install the robust fix, validator participation in the protocol that bootstraps the network’s on-chain randomness fell below the required threshold, and randomness disabled itself as designed.

(On-chain randomness is a protocol the network uses to produce a number nobody can predict or fake, even though every validator has to agree on the same value. Apps that depend on chance — lotteries, certain games, random NFT mints — can’t run without it.)

A latent bug then failed to persist that disabled state to disk, leaving validators unaware on the next restart that randomness had been turned off. The next epoch change stalled for close to six hours as randomness-dependent transactions piled up in a paused queue.

No user funds were at risk during any of the outages, and no committed transactions were reverted, the foundation said.

SUI dropped roughly 8% during the cascade to a low of $0.90 and was trading near $0.90 on Monday, leaving the token down about 19% on the week, per CoinDesk data.

The events represent Sui’s third major reliability incident since its 2023 mainnet launch, following a two-hour transaction scheduling bug in November 2024 and a six-hour consensus divergence in January 2026.

More For You

XRP News

A draft XRPL amendment notes that flash loan attacks are “structurally impossible” on the network because of how its transactions are built, an architectural quirk that has spared the chain from the exploit class that has cost Ethereum DeFi billions.

What to know:

  • Recent DeFi exploits on protocols like Thorchain, Drift and KelpDAO have relied on flash loans, a mechanism that does not exist on the XRP Ledger.
  • Because XRPL transactions are atomic and cannot include composable intra-transaction calls, flash loan attacks are structurally impossible on the network.
  • As XRPL pursues AMM upgrades…

About the Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories