Beyond the Arbitrum dispute

Gerstein’s move against Arbitrum fits into a broader legal strategy to pursue North Korean-linked assets as they surface on decentralized finance (DeFi) infrastructure.

In a separate January lawsuit, many of the same terrorism judgment creditors that went after Arbitrum sued Railgun DAO, alleging the privacy protocol allowed North Korean actors to move funds that should have been frozen and made available to creditors.

At the time, the plaintiffs claimed North Korean hackers used Railgun to launder funds from prior cyberattacks, including the $1.5 billion Bybit exploit, and argued the protocol should have frozen those assets rather than allowing them to move onward.

Once DPRK-controlled wallets were moving funds through the protocol, those assets became potential targets for collection, they argued.

In March, they asked a Washington federal court clerk to enter default against Railgun DAO after alleging the protocol failed to respond to the complaint despite being served. Their complaint also names Digital Currency Group, alleging the crypto investment firm’s $10 million purchase of Railgun governance tokens in 2022 made it a participant in the DAO’s governance and economics.

And in February, the plaintiffs moved to secure USDT that the U.S. government had sought to seize through a forfeiture motion.

More For You

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (CoinDesk)

The Senate Banking Committee announced it would hold its markup hearing for the Clarity Act on March 14.

What to know:

  • The Senate Banking Committee said it would hold its markup hearing for the Clarity Act on Thursday, May 14.
  • The market structure bill had been in limbo since January, with issues like stablecoin yield holding up the bill’s advancement. Lawmakers seem ready to move on with a compromise brokered by…

About the Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories