The Ninth Circuit Appeals Court has denied Kalshi’s emergency request to halt a lower court proceeding, paving the way for Nevada regulators to enforce a temporary restraining order (TRO) against the prediction market platform. The ruling, announced on Thursday, marks a significant setback for Kalshi, which has been embroiled in a legal battle with Nevada authorities over its sports event contracts.
Gaming lawyer Daniel Wallach commented that the TRO is now imminent, and Kalshi will be unable to operate in Nevada for at least 14 days until a preliminary injunction hearing is held. Since a TRO is not appealable under Nevada law, Kalshi would be required to exit the state in the interim,
Wallach explained.
Nevada’s Legal Challenge
The Nevada Gaming Control Board issued a cease-and-desist order to Kalshi in March, arguing that the company’s sports event contracts constitute unlicensed sports betting under state law. Kalshi has countered that its event contracts fall under the jurisdiction of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), a federal regulator, and that any block on its operations would cause imminent harm.
Prediction Markets Under Scrutiny
The legal challenges faced by Kalshi are part of a broader trend of increased scrutiny on prediction markets. Platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket have seen a surge in trading volumes, with weekly volumes now consistently exceeding $2 billion, according to Dune Analytics. This growth has attracted the attention of lawmakers, who are concerned about potential issues such as insider trading and market manipulation.
State-Level Regulatory Actions
State regulators in Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, and other jurisdictions have also taken action against prediction market platforms. Kalshi, along with competitors like Crypto.com, Polymarket, and Coinbase, are currently engaged in legal battles with multiple states over the legality of their sports event contracts.
Kalshi’s Legal Strategy
In a motion filed on March 13, Kalshi argued that allowing Nevada to proceed with its TRO while federal litigation is still pending could create a serious risk of conflicting rulings. The company warned that courts could arrive at exactly the opposite conclusion regarding whether federal commodities law preempts state gambling laws, potentially leading to jurisdictional chaos.
Future Implications
The legal outcomes of these cases will have significant implications for the future of prediction markets in the United States. If Kalshi and other platforms are successful in their arguments, it could pave the way for a clearer regulatory framework that recognizes the unique nature of these financial instruments. Conversely, a series of unfavorable rulings could force these platforms to exit certain states or even reconsider their business models entirely.
As the legal battles continue, the prediction market industry remains in a state of flux, with stakeholders closely watching the outcomes of these proceedings to gauge the future direction of regulatory oversight.
About the Author
