In a landmark decision that could reshape the crypto industry, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) have jointly issued guidance clarifying that most digital assets are not securities. The 68-page document, released on Tuesday, outlines a detailed framework for classifying different types of tokens and provides market participants with much-needed clarity after years of uncertainty.
SEC Chair Paul Atkins emphasized the significance of the new interpretation, stating, “After more than a decade of ambiguity, this guidance will provide market participants with a clear understanding of how the Commission treats crypto assets.” At the DC Blockchain Summit in Washington, Atkins added, “We’re not the ‘securities and everything commission’ anymore.”
A New Token Taxonomy
At the heart of the guidance is a “token taxonomy” that categorizes digital assets into several distinct groups. According to the agencies, stablecoins, digital commodities, and “digital tools” are explicitly not considered securities. Digital collectibles, including tokenized representations of art, media, or cultural items, also fall outside the securities classification.
“Digital commodities, digital collectibles, digital tools, and payment stablecoins are not securities,” SEC Chair Paul Atkins announced.
Only one category, described as “digital securities,” remains subject to traditional securities laws. These assets, which mirror existing financial instruments like equities or debt but are issued and traded using blockchain infrastructure, are the only ones that will continue to be regulated as securities.
Resolving the Howey Test Debate
The guidance aims to resolve a long-standing debate over the application of the SEC v. W.J. Howey Co. standard, known as the Howey Test, to crypto markets. The Howey Test determines whether a transaction qualifies as an investment contract based on expectations of profit derived from the efforts of others. Under the new interpretation, a digital asset that is not inherently a security can become one if it is marketed as an investment in a common enterprise with promises of profit tied to managerial efforts. However, the designation is not permanent; once those promises are fulfilled or become irrelevant, the asset may no longer be treated as a security.
Clarifying Crypto Activities
The agencies also addressed specific crypto activities that have been under regulatory scrutiny. Protocol mining, staking, and certain airdrops do not constitute securities transactions under the new framework. Airdrops, in particular, are unlikely to meet the “investment of money” requirement under the Howey Test.
The CFTC and SEC issued a statement clarifying that Bitcoin mining rewards are labeled under “protocol mining” and are not securities.
A Step Toward Regulatory Harmonization
The CFTC endorsed the interpretation and aligned its approach with the SEC, signaling closer coordination between the two regulators. CFTC Chair Mike Selig said the joint effort reflects a broader push toward regulatory “harmonization” and provides a clearer path for market participants.
This new approach stands in contrast to the enforcement-focused strategy of former SEC Chair Gary Gensler, whose tenure was marked by numerous actions against major crypto firms and a broader interpretation of securities laws. Industry participants often criticized this approach as “regulation by enforcement,” arguing that it created uncertainty and stifled innovation.
Future Proposals and Legislative Action
Despite the comprehensive nature of the guidance, it does not carry the force of formal rulemaking. Atkins indicated that the SEC plans to introduce additional proposals in the coming weeks, including an “innovation exemption” aimed at giving crypto firms more flexibility while maintaining investor protections. Lawmakers in Congress are also working on legislation to establish a comprehensive market structure for digital assets, recognizing that statutory changes will be necessary to make the new approach permanent.
Impact and Forward-Looking Insight
The new guidance sends a clear signal that U.S. regulators are redefining their stance on crypto. By narrowing the definition of what constitutes a security and providing specific categories, the SEC and CFTC have addressed the industry’s long-standing demand for clarity. This shift is likely to reshape how crypto businesses operate in the United States, with regulators emphasizing defined boundaries over broad enforcement. As the industry moves forward, the focus will be on how effectively these new guidelines can support both compliance and technological innovation.
About the Author
