“You can’t just replace what exists,” said Nadine Chakar, who heads digital assets at DTCC. “This is an evolution.”

That approach reflects a broader shift in the market. Early tokenization efforts often looked for problems to solve. Now, firms are targeting specific pain points, especially in areas such as collateral, cross-border payments, and liquidity management.

For large corporations, the ability to move funds in real time — across time zones and holidays — is changing how treasury functions operate. Instead of pre-positioning cash days in advance, firms can react instantly to margin calls or investment opportunities.

Still, the panelists pushed back on the idea that blockchain will remove intermediaries altogether. Core functions like risk management, compliance and settlement guarantees remain hard to replicate in fully decentralized systems.

“We will always need some level of intermediation,” Chakar said.

Crypto-native players, however, see a longer arc. Evan Auyang, president at Animoca Brands, said the industry is still in a transition phase, with blockchain gradually proving its efficiency before a bigger structural change.

“The nature of blockchain is that it’s transformative,” Auyang said, pointing to faster processes like loan approvals that can shrink from weeks to days. But he added that fully native onchain markets are “not ready yet,” given the scale of existing systems and regulatory constraints.

At the same time, he argued, the direction is hard to ignore. “If there’s efficiency and cost savings, it will be adopted,” he said, adding that traditional finance and decentralized systems are now “converging.”

AI Disclaimer: Parts of this article were generated with the assistance from AI tools and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our standards. For more information, see CoinDesk’s full AI Policy.

More For You

Hacker facing screens with lines of code (Boitumelo/Unsplash)

The lending protocol proposed tokenized claims, a revenue-backed pool and a security overhaul as it works with law enforcement to recover the stolen funds.

What to know:

  • Drift Protocol outlined a recovery plan for users hit by its $295 million April 1 exploit, which it attributed to a North Korea–backed DPRK hacking group identified by Mandiant.
  • The plan centers on issuing recovery tokens pegged to verified user losses and funding a pool—starting with about $3.8 million and…

About the Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories