Becoming the largest validator is indicative of Telegram’s willingness to put its own weight behind the chain’s security and direction. This likely reduces one of TON’s biggest overhangs, namely the gap between the Telegram narrative and TON Foundation’s execution.

The story doesn’t end there. In the same X post, Durov said TON fees have fallen sixfold to near zero, after previously announcing that transaction costs would drop to 0.00039 TON, or about $0.0005, with most transactions eventually moving toward a fee-less model.

Near-zero transaction costs matter most for the kinds of products Telegram can actually distribute, such as on-chain tips, games, bot payments, mini-app transactions, collectibles, and small retail transfers.

A fee that looks irrelevant to a DeFi whale can still kill a consumer app if users are moving cents or dollars at a time. Fixed, tiny costs make TON more usable for high-frequency, low-value activity, broadening its appeal as a blockchain among existing users.

Various tracking sites put Telegram’s estimated monthly users at as much as one billion, though the company has not publicly claimed or denied those figures.

But TON’s fundamentals have failed to catch up to that hype in recent years. DefiLlama data shows TON captures just over $69 million in locked value across its decentralized finance (DeFi) applications, far below its 2024 highs near $800 million. Daily chain fees sit around $3,600, DEX volume around $29 million, and app revenue near $134,000.

Data from Tonstat shows shows daily active wallet activity on TON at just under 50,000, coming from around 136,000 unique wallets. That compares with roughly 700,000 daily activities across more than 2.2 million wallets during August and September 2024, according to the data.

More For You

Ripple (Shutterstock)

Ripple said April’s $285 million Drift breach revealed a new pattern of long-cycle social engineering replacing traditional smart contract exploits.

What to know:

  • Ripple is sharing its internal intelligence on North Korean threat actors with the Crypto ISAC to help crypto firms spot coordinated infiltration campaigns.
  • Recent attacks like the Drift and Kelp exploits relied on long-term social engineering and malware, not smart contract bugs, allowing North Korean operatives to steal more than…

About the Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories