At the same time, a significant share of funds has moved into stablecoins, particularly USDC, as users step out of risk and wait on the sidelines rather than immediately redeploying capital.

Not all of Aave’s decline reflects capital rotation. Part of the drop comes from loans being repaid and positions unwound, mechanically shrinking TVL without a new destination.

The result is a fragmented market response. Capital is flowing toward simplicity, controlled risk and even cash, suggesting that after Kelp, confidence in shared collateral layers has weakened rather than shifted elsewhere.

Mehr für Sie

Multiple people grabbing slices of a pizza (Klara Kulikova/Unsplash)

Polymarket prices low odds of a system-wide redistribution, as the protocol weighs how to handle an undercollateralized rsETH supply

Was Sie wissen sollten:

  • A Polymarket contract suggests only a 14% chance that Kelp DAO will spread the losses from the $292 million rsETH exploit across all holders.
  • The hack drained about 116,500 rsETH from a LayerZero-powered bridge spanning more than 20 blockchains, leaving some rsETH undercollateralized and certain users effectively holding partially unbacked…

About the Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories